A call to thinkers, everywhere.
Ideas for humanity.
Juezi welcomes thinkers around the world. We value a meaningful contribution and verifiable sources.
Manuscript format: clear and readable.
Take inspiration from the clear structure of public Google DeepMind and Microsoft Research papers. These are Juezi recommendations, not a universal company template.
- Files: PDF or Word (.docx) is accepted. Save older .doc files as .docx or PDF first. You do not need to provide both formats.
- Structure: title, abstract, main text, conclusion or discussion, and references. Empirical work should explain methods and results; philosophy and cultural work may follow a question-and-argument structure. Keywords are optional.
- Layout: A4 or Letter, preferably one column, 11–12 pt body text, 1.3–1.5 line spacing, margins around 2–2.5 cm and page numbers. An existing readable journal or conference layout is also welcome.
- Figures and tables: use matching numbers, captions and in-text references; readable labels, data sources, units and relevant methods. Do not present AI illustrations or simulations as real observations.
- Citations: use a consistent style such as APA, IEEE or Chicago. References, quotations and their sources must be real and traceable.
Structure examples, not submission destinations · Google DeepMind: Gemini 2.5 · Microsoft Research
Suggested lengths by field, without a hard limit.
Concise findings and developed arguments are both welcome. These ranges are Juezi’s own guidance: being shorter or longer does not cause automatic rejection, and padding is unnecessary.
Suggested lengths by field, without a hard limit.
| Field | Chinese / Japanese body characters | English / French / German / Spanish body words |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 3,000–12,000 | 2,000–8,000 |
| Culture | 3,000–12,000 | 1,500–8,000 |
| Technology | 4,000–15,000 | 2,000–10,000 |
| Natural sciences | 4,000–12,000 | 2,000–8,000 |
| Medicine & health | 4,000–10,000 | 2,500–7,000 |
| Sport | 3,000–9,000 | 2,000–6,000 |
| Social sciences | 4,000–14,000 | 2,500–9,000 |
| Other | No limit; prioritize completeness and clarity | No limit; prioritize completeness and clarity |
Exclude the abstract, references and appendices. Characters and words are different measures; no fixed conversion is intended. Short perspectives may use around 1,000–3,000 CJK characters or 600–1,500 words. Reviews and extended studies may exceed the ranges. The technical upload limit remains 5 MiB per file.
Length-planning references distinguish article types rather than applying one limit to all research. The ranges below are set by Juezi. · Frontiers · BJSM
Two manuscripts. Separate identities.
Submit two manuscripts in PDF or Word (.docx), up to 5 MiB each. The named version includes author names and biographies. The anonymous version retains the same research but removes names, biographies, affiliations, contact details, acknowledgments and identifying file properties. For anonymous Word files, also accept tracked changes, remove comments and clear personal properties. Only the administrator holds the author dossier; reviewers receive the checked anonymous version. The administrator prepares the final public PDF after acceptance.
Welcome AI. Give ideas room to grow.
AI may be used for ideation, research assistance, writing, translation, code, figures, formatting and creative production, without limits on its role or extent. No tool list, usage breakdown or generated-content percentage is required. Authors must understand and explain the core question, claims and reasoning, take responsibility for the final work, and support the origins of their contribution with relevant research or creative records. Review focuses on contribution, reasoning and verifiability rather than whether AI was used.
Verifiable facts. Debatable ideas.
Report data, sources, quotations and research activities honestly. Do not invent references, experiments, interviews, results or other people’s views. Simulations, thought experiments and speculative work are welcome when clearly identified; they must not be presented as observations. Claims may be novel, disputed or untested: state their grounds, reasoning and limits. Provide a DOI, stable link, or book edition and page numbers for references. Where applicable, include human-research ethics and consent information in the named dossier and remove participant identifiers.
Make concepts clear. Make discussion possible.
Disciplines use language differently. Explain how key concepts are used in your work and distinguish facts, interpretations, value judgments and hypotheses. Readers should understand what you claim and how it can be examined or discussed. We welcome diverse expressions and ideas: clarity does not require agreement, and openness does not turn fiction into fact.
Review and a personal reply
Our usual review target is 7 working days, counted Monday to Friday in UTC. Complex submissions or reviewer availability may require longer. The editor screens submissions, invites anonymous reviewers when appropriate, then makes a decision. Both acceptance and decline are communicated personally by the administrator by email; the result also appears in your account. Acceptance does not automatically publish the paper. Save a private draft at any step. Track received, screening, anonymous review, revision requested and accepted in your account. If revisions are requested, upload both revised files and a point-by-point response; earlier versions remain available. Revised submissions enter a new review round with a fresh review target.